Focus on All Child Therapies Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954778897
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3104759620
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,701,205
- Expenses
- $3,587,084
- Assets
- $3,759,289
- Liabilities
- $347,663
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LANIA GLAUDE (PRESIDENT/CEO (THUR MARCH 2023))
- JOHN CAUSEY III (BOARD CHAIR/CEO (FROM MARCH 2023))
Highest reported compensation
- LANIA GLAUDE (PRESIDENT/CEO (THUR MARCH 2023)): $250,450 total reported compensation
- JOHN CAUSEY III (SECRETARY/TREASURER/CFO (THRU MARCH 2023)): $14,700 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide individualized and affordable mental health services that support clients throughout their lifespan while concurrently supporting clients to reach their full potential, developing meaningful relationships with family and friends, and be successful contributors to society.
What it reported doing in 2022
Adult services/gap - fact's adult and transition programs comprise unique community integration services for young adults ages 18-28 with developmental disabilities by providing supported hands-on vocational, employment and educational experiences, including student-developed social enterprises. Fact is also committed to provide both training and education to undergraduate and graduate students training for service in the field.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $250K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.