Fmhm Community Living
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208597755
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Napoleon, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4195926451
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,342,515
- Expenses
- $3,377,410
- Assets
- $498,229
- Liabilities
- $3,510,812
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS DELFAVERO (PRESIDENT)
- TERRI RODRIGUEZ (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CAROL SLIGHT (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TERRI RODRIGUEZ (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $169,370 total reported compensation
- KEN RICHMOND (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $104,950 total reported compensation
- CAROL SLIGHT (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $98,775 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Recognizing that we are all created in god's image, our mission is to support people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in reaching their greatest level of independence in a caring community of respect, dignity and partnership.
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of the filling homes waiver/supported living services is to enable adults with developmental disabilities to live in more typical housing options in safe residential neighborhoods, with persons of their choice through a community based system of support and services. This is done through homemaker personal care (hpc) and transportation services available through the individual options, level 1, and self waivers. The goal is assisting each person to be as independent as possible, while maintaining the person's health and safety. Persons participating in this program are eligible to receive adult day programming from the filling homes certified habiliation center. A wide variety of activities are available to meet individual needs and preferences. See schedule o for continuation. A large portion of the program focuses on creating opportunities for socialization, community involvement, sensory stimulation, repositioning, enhancement of life skills, and work training skills along with aquatic and physical therapies. Everything is done in a way to promote respect, dignity, and the highest level of personal achievement and independence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.05; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.3% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $169K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.