Flower & Fruit Mission of the Saratoga Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
146049447
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
Phone
5185802608
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,166
Expenses
$10,440
Assets
$142,407
Liabilities
$90,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Elizabeth Silver (First Vice President)
  • Jennifer Perry (President)
  • Stephanie Collins (Second Vice President)
  • Cara Milde (Former President)

People named in this filing

  • Carly Connors (Treasurer)
  • Elizabeth Silver (First Vice President)
  • Jennifer Perry (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Equip & Maintain the Maternity Unit of Saratoga Hospital

What it reported doing in 2024

Part III - Line 28 - Scholarship Program: The Flower & Fruit Mission of the Saratoga Hospital sponsors this program to maintain and support education of nurses and other medical staff who provide patient care in the maternity unit at Saratoga Hospital. PeriFACTS OB/GYN Academy was the participating Educating Organization that provided the education. During 2024, funding was provided for education for the following classes as listed below: PeriFACTS OB/GYN Academy - Subscription fees for online training software for all Saratoga Hospital Maternity Unit Nursing and Medical Staff. $660

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.6%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 6

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 90.5%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.64; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.63; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.6% of revenue deployed · 6.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $660 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.