Florida Technological Research &
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593655421
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Melbourne, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3218721050
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $327
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To encourage, support, publish and distribute educational materials, conduct educational forums, lectures and seminars. To promote and support applied research projects and programs at accredited institutions of higher learning throughout the state of Florida, both public and private, which lend themselves to transfer to industrial processes and improve manufacturing quality, research and productivity. To encourage, cooperate with, and assist accredited institutions of higher learning, community colleges, or vocational schools and public schools k-12 by providing support for in-service training of mathematics and science teachers.
What it reported doing in 2012
To engage in fundraising activities to help technological research and development authority provided support for in-service training of mathematics and science teachers at accredited institutions of higher learning, community colleges, vocational schools, and public schools.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 4
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 33%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -80.3% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -65.9% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -50.6% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.