Florida Society of Interventional Pain Physicians Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043722319
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Lebanon, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3525970907
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $408,002
- Expenses
- $510,963
- Assets
- $111,124
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE BYERS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JULIO PAEZ MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
- MAULIK BHALANI MD (PRESIDENT)
- VANIA FERNANDEZ (PRESIDENT ELECT)
People named in this filing
- ANDREA TRESCOT MD PhD (DIRECTOR)
- VIJAY BABU MD (DIRECTOR)
- DEBORAH TRACY MD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To pursue excellence in education as it concerns interventional pain management and related sciences. To uphold high principles, policies and practices for the attainment of the best in care for the patient suffering pain. To provide communication with other groups with complementary interests. To develop understanding of the socioeconomic impact of pain and its treatment,
What it reported doing in 2025
Clinical workshops conferences
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $413K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 16 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX ConferencesMeetings column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.