Florida Pointer Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462601218
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- New Smyrna Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3868048859
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $261,070
- Expenses
- $240,304
- Assets
- $53,540
- Liabilities
- $1,198
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HEIDI KLEM (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DEBORAH E DRUAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- HEIDI KLEM (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To rescue dogs from overcrowded kill shelters, unwanted litters, and from owners no longer able to care for them. We rescue dogs, pups, seniors and pregnant dogs from Florida and bordering states and provide shelter, food, medical care, transportation, and affection to homeless dogs of all breeds and the dogs are fostered in private homes till adopted. Our hands-on rescue efforts secure permanent loving homes for hundreds of dogs and puppies each year. Organization is dedicated to rescuing, nurturing and adopting dogs - both big and small into loving homes. Florida pointer rescue joins in the fight to reduce the vast problem of pet overpopulation by requiring every adopted dog and pup are spayed or neutered. All dogs brought into the rescue are examined by a licensed veterinarian and are given complete vetting care including age appropriate vaccinations, dewormed, and placed on flea and heart worm preventive, spayed or neutered, and adults are heart wormed tested.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $178K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.