Florida Mental Health Counselors Assoc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593585118
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $152,660
- Expenses
- $136,382
- Assets
- $66,160
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL HOLLER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL HOLLER (PRESIDENT)
- NORMAN E HOFFMAN (TREASURER)
- KATHIE ERWIN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Florida mental health counselors association is to advance the profession of clinical mental health counseling through intentional and strength-based advocacy, networking, professional development, legislative efforts, public education, and the promotion of positive mental health for our communities. Fmhca is the only organization in the state of Florida dedicated exclusively to meeting the professional needs of Florida's licensed mental health counselors. Protecting, sustaining, and advancing the profession of mental health counseling in the state of Florida is the guiding motto. The organization has served mental health counselors for more than 20 years, in a variety of professional ways. With the collaboration of local chapters, individual members, and lobbyist, we are dedicated to the success of our members as a mental health professional and the growth of the profession.
What it reported doing in 2014
Fmhca hosted annual conference providing members various choices for professional development and relevant ceu hours on qualified supervisor training, hypnosis basic training, laws and rules, forensic mental health evaluator certification training and many other approaches to counseling.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 38.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 56% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.