Florida Local Government Information Systems Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591894353
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tallahassee, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8502229684
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,359,469
- Expenses
- $1,269,851
- Assets
- $706,483
- Liabilities
- $20,357
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT BEACH CGCIO (PRESIDENT)
- MIKE ANDREWS CGCIO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TIM DAVIS (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
- TODD BAYLEY CGCIO (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RICARDO CASTILLO CGCIO (DIRECTOR AT LARGE)
- MICHELLE TAYLOR CGCIO (NORTHWEST DIRECTOR)
- HEATHER BUCHANAN CPTM (NORTHEAST DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Florida local government information systems association (flgisa) is to provide a forum for managers of Florida's local government information systems departments to be able to share experiences and learn new technologies. Ultimately, the mission of flgisa is to assist managers in providing the best possible service in the most efficient way to our customers, the citizens of the state of Florida.
What it reported doing in 2024
Annual conference - the 2025 annual conference was held in orlando in july. The conference offered 15 hours of ceu credits available in multiple breakout sessions. The conference also provided opportunities for attendees to network with other local government technology leaders. Topics included cisa cybersecurity tabletop exercise, secrets from a legendary spy hunter: decoding ai deepfakes, extortion, and more, gis value in local government, scada security q&a panel, truly human leadership: the skills and courage to care, every conversation counts: how to build extraordinary relationships, stories in ai exploration, be first to what's next: neocity overview, cybersecurity in 2025 & beyond: how to tame the ransomware beast, how to have privacy, security, and safety in an interconnected world, and high trust, high execution. A total of 416 registrants attended in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 31.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.