Florida Is for Veterans Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472327385
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Phone
8502968116
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,005,772
Expenses
$3,011,486
Assets
$1,887,809
Liabilities
$1,268,663

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH MARINO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSEPH MARINO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,643 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Veterans Florida provides career, skillbridge and entrepreneurship training and opportunities for separating or retiring servicemembers, veterans, and their spouses in or moving to Florida, and we assist employers seeking to strengthen their workforce with military talent.

What it reported doing in 2024

Veterans Florida is a nonprofit corporation within the Florida department of veterans affairs created to provide veterans and their spouses with employment opportunities and to promote their hiring by the business community. Veterans Florida is governed by a nine-member board of directors with the governor, president of the senate, and speaker of the house of representatives each appointing three members. Veterans Florida is statutorily directed to administer two programs to help meet the employment needs of veterans and the business community: the veterans Florida entrepreneurship program and the veterans workforce training grant program. Veterans Florida is also required by statute to serve as the state's principal assistance organization under the u.s. Department of defense's (dod) skillbridge program for employers and servicemembers transitioning out of active-duty service. As the state's principal veterans assistance organization, veterans Florida works to increase the number of employee offerings and servicemember matches to the skillbridge program.the entrepreneurship program provides servicemembers, veterans and spouses with a comprehensive suite of training options designed to enhance their entrepreneurial abilities, giving veterans the skills to create, operate, and grow their own businesses.the workforce training grant program helps veterans translate their military experience to comparable civilian workforce requirements by providing grant funding to Florida businesses to train full-time veteran employees. The program's goal is to give veterans technical skills that are marketable, usable, and transferable. Veterans Florida reimburses Florida businesses for 50% of the incurred training costs, up to a maximum of $8,000 per veteran employee.the dod skillbridge program allows servicemembers to intern with a civilian employer in their final six months of active duty. Servicemembers may be granted up to 180 days of permissive duty to focus solely on training full time with approved industry partners that offer real-world training and in-demand work experience. The program is designed to reduce the employment gap for veterans between their military separation and civilian life. Servicemembers participating in skillbridge maintain their military compensation and benefits. This arrangement benefits industry partners by providing access to a highly skilled workforce without incurring full training costs. Florida's skillbridge initiative provides a job pipeline for transitioning servicemembers, which encourages them to relocate to the state and establish permanent residency.the veterans Florida marketing and communications campaign encourages members of the target market to remain in the state or make the state their permanent residence. The target audience is servicemembers who have 24 months or less until discharge, veterans with 36 months or less since discharge, and members of the Florida national guard or reserves.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 43.5%; rating input score 44; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $137K · 12 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $140K reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.