Florida International Teaching Zoo
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651315102
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Belleview, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3528677788
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,906
- Expenses
- $43,748
- Assets
- $275,593
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK WILSON (PRESIDENT)
- CHARLES JENKING (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARK WILSON (PRESIDENT)
- CHARLES JENKING (VICE PRESIDENT)
- VALERIE BROWNE (VET TECH)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote the responsible public education of conservation and reproduction of endangered and rare animals. Running zoo tours
What it reported doing in 2023
The Florida international teaching zoo promotes public educationthrough conservation and reproduction of endangered and rare animals.the Florida teaching zoo is a complete guided zoo keeper talk. It
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.3; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.