Florida Concrete & Products Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 590748052
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4078959333
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,346,680
- Expenses
- $4,769,580
- Assets
- $7,155,460
- Liabilities
- $612,243
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT SITTER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MATT SITTER (PRESIDENT): $260,401 total reported compensation
- KARL DUNKELMAN (DIRECTOR OF MARKETING): $121,068 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Florida concrete & products association was founded in the late 1950's when a group of concrete producers realized the need for a cooperative effort to promote their products throughout the state. With a membership of more than 100, the fc&pa is a multifaceted trade association headquartered in orlando, fl. It represents companies statewide that produce ready-mixed concrete, cement, aggregate (limestone and sand), and admixtures (chemicals) for concrete. The fc&pa through its eight promotional regions is actively involved in marketing, promotions, training and education. Routinely our regional promotional committees sponsor product demonstrations, training seminars and education opportunities for our customers - both present and prospective. The assocaition is continually involved with the state's major universities ensuring that architectural, engineering and building construction students are exposed to current technical information.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide seminars and courses, forums for the interchange of ideas, and information related to concrete and related industries. Facilitating members with codes and standards for industry members. Awarding scholarships to students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $260K · 17 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.