Florida Coastal Cocker Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814812694
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Cape Coral, FL, USA
- Phone
- 2392207763
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $553,251
- Expenses
- $215,054
- Assets
- $353,911
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Karena Loudin (President)
People named in this filing
- Karena Loudin (President)
- Melissa Lynn Skinner (Director)
- Gisel Mueller (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Florida coastal cocker rescue fccr is a not-for-profit organzation geographically located within the state of Florida dedicated to rescuing rehabilitating and re-homing dogs in need. They work solely through a network of dedicated volunteers and have no paid staff. Supporting revenues consist primarly of amounts derived from both donors and adoption fees. Operating program costs include medical veterinary amounts as well as grooming training supplies and general and adminstrative amounts. Before leaving the program for their adoptive home all dogs are altered updated on vaccinations tested for heartworms and treated accordingly if necessary established on flea and heartworm preventative medications and microchipped. In addition and in effort to ensure all dogs will have safe and loving homes the organization carefully screens all potential foster and adoption home applicants.
What it reported doing in 2024
Various costs associated with rehabilitating homeless dogs including supplies dog food veterinary costs grooming expenses shelter pull fees and medications including flea and heartworm.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.3%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.1%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.3% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $212K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.