Florida Association of Test Administrators
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823396628
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Ocoee, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9547367167
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,611
- Expenses
- $56,735
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KACY LIBERSAT (PRESIDENT)
- VACANT (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KACY LIBERSAT (PRESIDENT)
- VACANT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHARLENE SOZIO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote quality assessment practices for state-wide assessments serve as a global voice on issues of importance related to state, national, and international assessments provide support, guidance and assistance to new district assessment administrators engage in any other lawful activities that further the sole purpose of the organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
Officers represented fata memebers at the Florida department of education 2024 assessment debrief in june, held in both modalities, in person, and virtually. Items discussed included: statewide assessment administration practices, proposed testing dates for 2023-2024school year, revisions to test administrator manuals, and transition of reporting platform providers. Collaborate with district assessment test coordinators to share best practices in test administration and maintain test security. Maintained and monitored a website for the Florida school district test administrators to share information on memebership, meeting minutes, resources for testadministrators; and survey results for member-originated and solicited questions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -50.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.