Florida Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463502696
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9044042350
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,092,175
Expenses
$12,164,944
Assets
$1,781,079
Liabilities
$1,194,742

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • REBECCA DELORENZO (EXECUTIVE DI): $156,545 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To represent and support not-for-profit clinics and networks that provide quality, cost-effective healthcare services at little or no charges to low-income, uninsured and under-served floridians

What it reported doing in 2025

Fafcc serves as the statewide association and coordinating entity for Florida's free and charitable clinics and clinic-based access networks. The organization advances access to care for uninsured and underserved floridians through public policy advocacy, grant administration, education and technical assistance, data collection and analysis, and statewide coordination and communications. Fafcc administers state and private grant programs on behalf of its member clinics, including the state funds grant program, which provides operational support for primary and specialty care services delivered by free and charitable clinics across Florida. Since the initial state appropriation in 2014, fafcc has served as the fiduciary and administrative entity for these funds, establishing grant policies, overseeing compliance and reporting, and disbursing awards to eligible clinics. During the reporting year, fafcc supported a network of more than 100 free and charitable clinics and access programs statewide through grantmaking, technical assistance, data and outcomes reporting, education and training, and policy advocacy designed to strengthen the safety net and expand access to care for uninsured floridians.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: $819.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $12.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $157K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.