Florida Angus Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
596139014
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lakeland, FL, USA
Phone
8636402008
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Agricultural Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,945
Expenses
$35,272
Assets
$18,673

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD LONGANECKER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD LONGANECKER (PRESIDENT)
  • TERRY EDMONSON (VICE PRESIDE)
  • NINA MADDOX (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Florida angus association is a community of ranch families dedicated to breeding, owning and showing the angus breed. Our mssion is to promote the angus breed and foster fellowhip among producers in the region. We fulfill our mission by hosting various events, including board meetings, two field days, and an annual meeting. The field days, typically held in the spring and fall, are often paired with our active junior program, featuring both registered and open angus shows. In april we organize the fjaa (fl jr. Angus association) spring show. It is held at the union county ag education center in lake butler, fl. In june we participate in the eastern regional junior angus show in west monroe, la, and the fca convention & allied trade show in marco island, fl. And in november we host the sunshine state classic inaugural faa angus production sale in dade city, fl. Activities are funded through annual membership fees and sponsors from within the angus community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Educational/social angus show events-organize the fjaa spring show in lake butler, fl and attend/participate in the eastern regional jr. Angus show in monroe, la.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.6%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.