Florida Alliance for Community Solu

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201848987
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$167,989
Expenses
$138,633
Assets
$75,524
Liabilities
$3,489

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • THERESA CHELIKOWSKY (EXECUTIVE DI): $54,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is a member-driven association of nonprofit community development corporations (cdcs)and their partners who are dedicated to strengthening floridas community based development institutions to better serve their communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, the alliance provided capacity building for the staff and board of member (and other) organizations to increase their ability to effectively serve their lower-wealth communities. In all, 24 hours of training on topics including successful collaboration, leadership challenges, disaster resiliency rural housing, fund development, artificial intelligence, effective communications, public policy, budgeting and using volunteers were provided to 108 people. Staff attended nine workshops with the purpose of obtaining the session materials to share with members, for an additional 15 hours of training. In addition, our weekly e-bulletin provided information on dozens of other training and capacity activities for our members to access. We estimate that i all, over 2100 hours of training was provided to 130 people from 80 organizations. Another 48 hours of individual assistance was provided to over 200 people from 55 organizations. One of our goals is to help protect funding for the work our members do in their communities. To that end, the alliance invested 133 hours in public policy education and advocacy for state and national resources used for the creation and preservation of affordable, attainable housing and community and economic development activities in our members service areas. A new, public policy webpage registered over 1,200 hits in just four months, demonstrating the demand for this information. Another goal is to provide current, relevant information on funding, education, industry research, best practices and employment opportunities to the membership. In 2025, we published 46 issues of the members only e- bulletin which went out to about 285 people each time. The email open rate was 30.5%, above the industry average of 26%. More importantly, the average click through rate, the number of times people click on a live link, was 15% vs the industry average of just 3%. Finally, in 2025, we surpassed our goals for volunteer activity. A total of 47 non-board members donated 594 hours of their time and expertise to the alliance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.7%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.7% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.