Florida Action Committee Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452809673
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Boynton Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8332737325
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,290
- Expenses
- $31,223
- Assets
- $195,399
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GAIL COLLETTA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GAIL COLLETTA (PRESIDENT)
- CINDY ROGERS (SECRETARY)
- ANITA KILLEN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advocate for evidenced based laws that promote public saftey
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization maintained communications with over 3000 members to keep them inform of legislative and legal issues. Responded to over 1200 inquiris from persons seeking assistance with needs after release from incarceration, to include housing, employment, and community service. Coordinated state wide meeting with Florida state legislators . Hosted 56 advocate training sessions. Facilitated 160 hours of peer- led supports groups. Presented 16 professional development workshop. Guest speekers at 8 professional conferences. Attended and presented at 23 legislators meeting
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.7%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 54.1%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 58%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.26; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.7% of revenue deployed · 54.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.