Florham Park Education Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831293878
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Florham Park, NJ, USA
Phone
9734527670
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,634
Expenses
$24,928
Assets
$58,314
Liabilities
$13,082

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alexis Seubert (President)

People named in this filing

  • Alexis Seubert (President)
  • Megan Mink (Secretary)
  • Faith Alcantara (Grants Committee Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Florham Park Education (FPEF) is a diverse volunteer-driven organization committed to providing enhanced educational programs for all students in the public school district of Florham Park, NJ regardless of race, gender, religion and (dis)ability. FPEF's mission is to strengthen public education in the district through advocacy, fundraising, and investment in programs that empower every student to achieve both academic and personal success. FPEF's flagship initiative is a competitive grants program in which faculty is invited to apply for funds to support student-centered educational projects that are not funded as part of the district's operating budget. In addition, FPEF administers the Community Care program to assist students in the district whose families face financial hardship.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Florham Park Education Foundation administered two grant cycles that funded 16 teacher-led proposals benefiting more than 950 students in preschool through 8th grade across the Florham Park Public School District. In addition, the FPEF funded a special 7th-grade grant initiative in which middle school students submitted proposals to benefit the Middle school community. Following a competitive application process, the winning student proposal received funding along with an award recognizing the student applicant's achievement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.8%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 1%; rating input score 1

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.9%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.8% of revenue deployed · 1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $246 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.