Florence Crittenton Services of Williamsport Pa Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
240797022
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-T 2021
Location
Williamsport, PA, USA
Phone
5703228349
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,125
Expenses
$29,665
Assets
$453,180

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LEE ANNE RAUCH (DIRECTOR/PRE)
  • TARYN BROWN (DIRECTOR/VIC)
  • PAMELA KLOTZ (DIRECTOR/TRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide services pertaining to the physical, mental and emotional needs of unwed females, to wit, programs dealing with prevention of pregnancy, public relations, an outreach program to the community, (schools if needed), birth control referral and counseling, abortion referral and counseling, general assistance to unwed females with respect to financial matters and the like, counseling for parents and/or punitive fathers, counseling and referral with respect to problem pregnancies and any other purpose duly accepted and agreed upon by the board of directors of the organization.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided pregnancy counseling and subsidization of confidential pregnancy tests as well as general assistance to unwed females with respect to financial matters and the like.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.28; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.