Florence Crittenton Home & Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 610449622
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Lexington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8592528636
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $736,408
- Expenses
- $794,863
- Assets
- $641,929
- Liabilities
- $273,151
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The florence crittenton home is a private non-profit, residential treatment facility, which provides comprehensive services in a home-like environment to females, who have been abused, neglected, abandoned or are experiencing pregnancy/parenting with mental health and behavioral issues. The facility strives to provide a stable, safe, nurturing atmosphere in order for residents to achieve the self-sufficiency, personal growth and family stability necessary to live successfully in a less restrictive environment.
What it reported doing in 2012
The florence crittenton home is a private non-profit, residential treatment facility, which provides comprehensive services in a home-like environment to females who have been abused, neglected, abandoned or are experiencing pregnancy/parenting with mental health and behavioral issues. The facility strives to provide a stable, safe, nurturing atmosphere in order for residents to achieve the self-sufficiency, personal growth and family stability necessary to live successfully in a less restrictive environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 81% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $645K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.