Florence Caring Pregnancy Center Pregnancy and Parenting Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760754078
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Florence, OR, USA
Phone
5419022273
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,820
Expenses
$82,725
Assets
$186,917
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Peggy Meyer (President)
  • Judi Burg (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Peggy Meyer (President)
  • Judi Burg (Vice President)
  • Sue Fuesser (Board of Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The florence caring pregnancy center is a safe, welcoming, and confidential place where we encourage, educate, and equip individuals and families along their pregnancy or parenting journey. We offer free pregnancy tests and options information; prenatal, parenting, and life skills education and support; maternity/baby/toddler supplies through our earn while you learn program; and community connections. Our services are free, confidential, and offered to anyone interested.

What it reported doing in 2025

The florence caring pregnancy center provided free and confidential prenatal, parenting, and life skills education and support to women and men, moms and dads. We provided maternity/baby/toddler supplies through our earn while you learn program. We provided free and confidential pregnancy tests and options information.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.