Five Starz Volleyball Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680143435
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Davis, CA, United States
- Phone
- 2094031207
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $418,849
- Expenses
- $344,488
- Assets
- $219,026
- Liabilities
- $778
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Elizabeth Colenzo (President)
Highest reported compensation
- April Donald (Director): $26,437 total reported compensation
- Elizabeth Colenzo (President): $17,384 total reported compensation
- Dana Anglin (Board Member): $11,229 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Five Starz Volleyball Club promotes a competitive junior volleyball program for young women, up to the age of 18, which provides positive coaching and the development of volleyball skills for all levels of athletes, with the ultimate goal to help shape healthy and confident young women. The Five Starz Volleyball Club promotes a competitive junior volleyball program for young women, up to the age of 18, which provides positive coaching and the development of volleyball skills for all levels of athletes. The ultimate goal is to help shape healthy and confident young women. CLUB GOALS. The Five Starz Volleyball Club (FSVC) is an organization that strives to provide and support competitive volleyball experience within a positive team environment. We are committed to the growth and development of healthy and self-determined young women and men through participation in the club....
What it reported doing in 2024
As a whole, we have competed in over 60 volleyball tournaments locally, around California, and out of state. Tournament fees, uniforms, and payroll are the significant costs associated to that program. We have won awards, competitions, and advanced the skills of our players throughout the year. Many of our players return to continue learning how to play volleyball so they can further their goals. During the reporting period, the club had 7 teams, comprised of 85 players. Further costs associated to the club include facility rentals for our youth to practice weekly. We have included summer skills, spring and winter camps, along with weekend conditioning clinics. These have served an additional 200 youth during that time.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 95.3%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.8%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.9%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 95.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $328K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.