Five Oaks Ag Research and Education Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852583244
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Humphrey, AR, USA
- Phone
- 8708301035
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,430,637
- Expenses
- $2,147,450
- Assets
- $22,016,075
- Liabilities
- $6,736,686
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE H DUNKLIN JR (PRESIDENT)
- H DALE HALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GEORGE H DUNKLIN JR (PRESIDENT)
- H DALE HALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- EDWARD A DICKEY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o for the primary mission statement.the mission of five oaks ag research and education center (foagrec) is to sustain and increase a vanishing bottomland hardwood forest ecosystem using the life history requirements of the mallard duck as indicators of the health of the ecosystem, and develop scientific professionals and guide public and private forest management to increase this critical wetland ecosystem complex.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o for detail.during 2024, the five oaks ag research and education center (foagrec) continued its partnership with the university of Arkansas (ua), the ua division of agriculture, and the ua at monticello (uam) to support educational and research activities. This partnership includes a graduate certificate program (gcp) at uam in waterfowl habitat and recreation management, which uses the five oaks property in humphrey ar as its field station and learning lab.foagrec continued to build capacity and conservation reach through acquisition of the little siberia and black woods properties. These acquisitions support long-term conservation of key bottomland hardwood forests and emergent wetland ecosystems. Construction also began on a new operations center to house foagrec staff, support habitat management, and serve as an education and event space.the third cohort of gcp students completed program requirements and were awarded certificates during the may 2024 commencement ceremony at uam. A new class began in fall 2024. To date, the gcp has produced 12 graduates, all of whom are working in waterfowl and wetland conservation across the country.foagrec's youth programs continued to provide conservation-based education for elementary school classes from around the region. The mike mallard program offers students outdoor experiences related to ecology, agriculture, and recreation at no cost to parents or schools. In 2024, foagrec hosted around 300 children and approximately 60 teachers and chaperones. An at-home version of the program was also available as a packaged activity box, and summer camps were expanded for local organizations and families.foagrec continued its collaborative research with uam faculty and other partners in the Mississippi alluvial valley on projects focused on agricultural and wetland health and on understanding waterfowl movement and behavior. These studies provide insight into how landscape dynamics in the Mississippi alluvial valley influence waterfowl ecology and the communities that depend on these resources.foagrec continues to excel in providing high-quality waterfowl habitat through active management and shares its experience with other practitioners through education and outreach. Through an agreement with five oaks duck lodge, approximately 300 hunter-conservationists visited during the 2023-24 duck season. These hunts support the nonprofit through tax-deductible contributions above the fair market value of the experience. Hunters receive conservation education from staff and graduate students as part of their visit.in addition to hosting hunter-conservationists, foagrec conducted field days in coordination with ducks unlimited, usda-nrcs, and other federal, state, and private conservation organizations. These events facilitate knowledge exchange among stakeholders and highlight the research, education, and conservation efforts occurring at five oaks.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.9%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,484.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 87.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.25; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 68.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 75% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.9% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.