Fitness Peace
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834483073
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Greenville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9033559913
- Rating
- 97
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $347
- Expenses
- $635
- Assets
- $4,489
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dereck Owens (President)
People named in this filing
- Dereck Owens (President)
- Joshua Slinkard (Secretary)
- Nathan SLinkard (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
501c3 Education and community service.
What it reported doing in 2022
Exempt for education and community services and funded by 1/3 minimum donations. We provided Fitness and nutritional information for anyone through our web services at Fitnesspeace.org. We also provided a free fitness class that served up to 23 females from age 60 to 84 in area code 75075. We provided fitness center memberships for 3 individuals in area code 75075, two males and one female and one male is receiving disability benefits. We also received $1450 dollars in grant money during North Texas Giving Day from the Mcmanemin grant.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -83%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.07; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 80.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 72% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $635 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.