FitLot

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462195523
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-T 2022, Form 990-N 2020
Location
New Orleans, LA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Physical Fitness and Community Recreational Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-1,411
Expenses
$91,310
Assets
$5,739
Liabilities
$441

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Adam Mejerson (Executive Director)
  • Curt Cole (Board Member and President)

People named in this filing

  • Adam Mejerson (Executive Director)
  • Curt Cole (Board Member and President)
  • Arianna Baseman (Board Member and Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To strengthen people and thier communities by supporting the creation and activation of public outdoor fitness parks and programs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Fitlot is committed to help communities find the resources they need to plan, build and program outdoor fitness parks. Fitlot believes every individual can and should enjoy the health benefits of an active lifestyle. Fitlots vision is for every individual to have access to a cost-free exercise space within walking distance of their homes. A fitlot is an outdoor fitness park that makes the benefits of indoor exercise training free and accessible to the public. In 2019 fitlot partnered with aarp to build a fitlot in all 50 states including d.c. Puerto rico and the us virgin islands. Since fitlot started in 2012 the organization has constructed and activated 57 parks nationwide and has facilitated 4,200 no-cost community fitlot classes.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for member benefits.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 43.8%; rating input score 44

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6,571.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 46.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -51.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.