Fit Oshkosh Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472394333
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Oshkosh, WI, USA
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,346
- Expenses
- $148,316
- Assets
- $28,376
- Liabilities
- $8,138
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOE WIEDENMEIER (PRESIDENT)
- TRACEY ROBERTSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JOE WIEDENMEIER (PRESIDENT)
- LISA TAYLOR (TREASURER)
- KAREN BOWEN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote social transformation
What it reported doing in 2018
To promote social transformation through color-brave conversations education advocacy and research in order to achieve race equity and justice within our community
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.3%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -160.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 40.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.3% of revenue deployed · 1.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.