Fishery Foundation of California
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942987019
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Crockett, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2096498914
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fisheries Resources
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $221,536
- Expenses
- $202,493
- Assets
- $82,867
- Liabilities
- $574
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TREVOR KENNEDY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TREVOR KENNEDY (PRESIDENT): $62,740 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve fisheries resources in the state of California.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fish and habitat monitoring: the fishery foundation of California (ffc) has been actively involved in the sacramento/san joaquin delta for 30 plus years both as a stakeholder and active participant in its adaptive management. Past and present activities include monitoring and evaluation of restored tidal and seasonal wetlands, tracking temporal and spatial distribution of salmon and steel head, the spatial documentation of fish community assemblages, and collection of year round water quality data. Ffc has increased awareness of delta issues and has furthered the scientific knowledge by publishing its many findings in the calfed and iep on journals and on the comprehensive assessment and monitoring program (camp) web site. Ffc staff serve on a number of scientific advisory committees in the central valley. The ffc is currently working with the department of water resources to reduce the number of predatory fish in clifton court forebay to increase survival of status fish moving throught the forebay. Salmon acclimation: ffc has been acclimating state and federal hatchery salmon since 1994. The project has been shown to increase survival of the salmon by 200-300 percent. The ffc acclimated 13.2 million hatchery salmon in 2016-2017. In total, the ffc has acclimated over 120 million salmon since the start of the program in 1994. Habitat restoration: in 2014-2018 the ffc implemented passage and habitat improvement projects in the cosumnes river watershed in partnership with the us fish and wildlife service. Ffc partnered in the fish passage assessment at 6 barriers in stevens creek during the same time period. Ffc staff serve on the cosumnes river technical advisory committee which raises awareness surrounding cosumnes river fishery issues and guides present and future restoration activities in the watershed. Currently, the ffc is monitoring the effectiveness of past restoration actions in the cosumnes watershed. Stanilaus habitat use pilot investigation: the ffc, in cooperation with the us bureau of reclamation is conducting a pilot study to document the change in habitat and fish distributions relative to discharge. The fcc, wildlands and the institute for natural systems engineering will team to implement the stanislaus river salmonid habitat use investigation. The purpose of the study be to determine fish and fish habitat reponse to different operational flows from goodwin dam into the lower stansliaus river.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.4%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $202K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $63K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.