First Americans Land Grant Consortium Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204184594
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Wolf Point, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4064809262
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,414
- Expenses
- $143,730
- Assets
- $154,216
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Adrian Quijada (President)
- Vacant (Vice President)
- Brian Neztosie (Past-President)
- Carrie Schumacher (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Adrian Quijada (President)
- Vacant (Vice President)
- Brian Kowalkokski (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Held an annual conference in Scottsdale, Arizona, on October 10-12, 2025. Approximately 250 participants with 35 Tribal colleges and universities
What it reported doing in 2025
Held Annual Conference in Scpttsdale, AZ. Approximately 250 registered for our conference, with 33 Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) represented (of 35 TCUs nationwide). Additionally, a Climate, Water, Equity, and Opportunity Workshop was also held for 1862, 1890, and 1994 land-grant colleagues from the North Central Region. This workshop increased knowledge and trust among 1862, 1890, and 1994 land-grant professionals working on climate and water related issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $118K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.