First Amendment Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330308483
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Rafael, CA, USA
- Phone
- 415-460-5060
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,438,342
- Expenses
- $1,411,288
- Assets
- $1,645,808
- Liabilities
- $55,197
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHERINE ROWLANDS (PRESIDENT)
- PETER SCHEER (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JULIET WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID SNYDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID SNYDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $198,860 total reported compensation
- DAVID LOY (LEGAL DIRECTOR): $165,750 total reported compensation
- KATHLEEN MORGAN (PHILANTHROPY DIRECTOR): $141,318 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The First Amendment Coalition is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing free expression, press freedom, and government transparency and accountability in California.
What it reported doing in 2024
Strategic litigation, education and advocacyfac uses integrated advocacy - litigation, education and policy advocacy - to advance open government, free-press rights, and the public's right to know. Some examples of important fac achievements in 2024: - successfully obtained preliminary injunction in federal court to prevent enforcement of California law criminalizing publication of sealed arrest reports - in clear violation of first amendment case law.- led coalition of 26 organizations to advocate for student journalist dilan gohill, 19, who was arrested june 5 while covering protests and the occupation of the stanford university president's office.- fac worked in the California legislature and at local governments across the state to advance laws and policies that strengthen first amendment and open-government rights, and to fight laws that would weaken those rights.- in federal court, challenged on first amendment grounds a local ordinance that criminalizes journalism by barring presence with intent to observe or record at "sideshows," dangerous automotive events that have frequently captured headlines in the bay area. - representing a student journalist at cal poly san luis obispo, fac obtained significant policy changes in how the university handles public records requests after filing a California public records act lawsuit against the university.- fac's work on amicus briefs throughout 2024, at both the trial court and appellate level, helped advance arguments in favor of free expression, press freedoms and open government.- as part of its press freedom initiative, fac represented, on a pro bono basis, several journalists who were subpoenaed in 2024 for their confidential sources and notes. Some examples of achievements in educating and empowering the public to use their rights: - hosted daylong watchdog workshop for central valley journalists. The training program provided tips and tactics on newsgathering issues, including accessing public records, covering public meetings, protecting confidential news sources and rights and risks surrounding recording in different settings. - trained second annual cohort of California local news fellows on covering open meetings and using public records for accountability journalism.- mentored early career journalists as part of national freedom of information coalition's foi boot camp for journalists of color.- fac responded to 1,111 queries on its free legal hotline, educating and empowering journalists, activists and others to use their rights to speak and publish freely, and to promote government transparency.- fac hosted and/or organized numerous workshops on press freedoms and government transparency laws. - updated and expanded our extensive library of published resources.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.1%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 52.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 60.1% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $847K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.