Fiorenza's Food for Friends (F4)inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452253155
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Coatesville, PA, USA
Phone
6109557090
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$242,342
Expenses
$144,044
Assets
$909,735
Liabilities
$2,694

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEREK FIORENZA (PRESIDENT)
  • BRENDA RUSSELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRENDA RUSSELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $81,250 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To connect sources of food to recipients in need with a long-term vision of creating a world without hunger.

What it reported doing in 2024

Fiorenza's food for friends (f4) inc. Sole purpose is to eradicate hunger. Our programs directly impact the needs of food-insecure people. F4's food rescue program is an alternative for food service businesses that allows them to donate their excess food to local non-profit organizations, promoting food security instead of throwing "good food" away. Food service businesses include supermarkets, restaurants, manufacturers, farmers, and other businesses that grow, distribute, or sell food. This emerging method of reducing waste promotes environmental sustainability while alleviating pressure on food banks and pantries. F4 engages directly with and supports non-profit organizations that are working to alleviate hunger and create sustainable food security in their communities. F4 is the counry's largest food recovery organization.f4's food drive program offers corporations an opportunity to give back and establish a presence within their local community. This is done by designing, installing, and leading non-perishable food drives that benefit local non-profit recipient agencies, including food banks, food pantries, food cupboards, and emergency housing agencies. F4's cooking program seeks volunteers to prepare and provide frozen meals for a shelter to reheat and feed the community. This program enables individuals, families, businesses, and organizations a volunteer opportunity to participate at any time of the year. All f4 services are provided at no cost to the food donors or recipient partners. F4's staff of 2 provided other nonprofit organizations with access to over 2 million pounds of food at no cost. F4's rate of return for every $1 spent is 12 pounds of food donated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.5%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $35.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.32; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 56.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.5% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $132K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.