Finger Lakes Performing Provider System Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472335735
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Rochester, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5852399300
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,617,153
- Expenses
- $16,456,927
- Assets
- $17,251,732
- Liabilities
- $7,989,260
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROL TEGAS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROL TEGAS (CEO): $308,828 total reported compensation
- KATHERINE ROGALA (CFO (THRU 2/21/25)): $229,148 total reported compensation
- JACQUELINE VERDURA (CHIEF SOLUTION AND OPERATN): $214,152 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a forward-thinking business that strives to provide our partners with valuable and innovative tools to improve healthcare and health outcomes in our region. The collaborative relationships and strategic partnerships we have formed with the partners and community stakeholders in our region has enabled successful implementation of transformational programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grhhn administers the nys health home program by working with a collaborative network of community providers to integrate community and clinical care across medical, behavioral health, substance use disorder, and community based service sectors; optimize health outcomes and quality of life for the most complex medicaid patients in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 82% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 62% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $14.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $309K · 28 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $270K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 43 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.