Find Qalicb Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993800840
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Indio, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7607753663
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $845,819
- Expenses
- $116,005
- Assets
- $12,519,367
- Liabilities
- $11,789,553
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE BATAVICK (PRESIDENT)
- DEBORAH ESPINOSA (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT & CEO OF FIND)
- JOHN ELLIOT (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DEBORAH ESPINOSA (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT & CEO OF FIND): $203,597 total reported compensation
- MATT DECOOK (CFO OF FIND): $66,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate exclusively for charitable, educational, religious, or scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, and to exclusively support and benefit, financially and/or operationally, food in need of distribution, inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation ("find") exempt from federal income taxation under section 501(c)(3) of the code and section 23701d of the California revenue and taxation code.
What it reported doing in 2024
Find qalicb organization, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation was formed for the benefit of food in need of distribution, inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation ("find").find qalicb entered into a new markets tax credit (nmtc) transaction to participate in the construction and development of a new building located at 83765 citrus avenue, indio, California 92201 (the property and the improvements to be located thereon are collectively referred to as the project) and it will lease the completed project to find pursuant to an operating lease for use as a volunteer services engagement center and a food distributions and workforce development center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.7%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 107.92; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.94; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $204K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.