Find Ignite Transform Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
812267310
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Noblesville, IN, USA
Phone
3174080834
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$357,189
Expenses
$265,739
Assets
$473,689
Liabilities
$210,255

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR MARY BETH WOEHRLE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR MARY BETH WOEHRLE (PRESIDENT): $11,671 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mental health program that utilizes couseling and fitness as a tool with the love of god to transform lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, ignite transform advanced its mission of supporting women and the broader community through holistic mental, physical, and spiritual wellness. Key program highlights include:- ignite transform program provided direct support, guidance, and recovery tools to women overcoming trauma, addiction, and life challenges. Participants experienced measurable progress toward healing, stability, and long-term recovery.- community dinners hosted weekly community meals that fostered belonging, reduced isolation, and provided a safe space for connection and encouragement.- breast cancer support group facilitated weekly meetings offering emotional support, resources, and hope for women navigating treatment and survivorship.- ignite center 4 community served a wide range of community members through: - mental health talks to educate, reduce stigma, and increase awareness. - spiritual growth groups providing safe spaces for reflection, faith exploration, and encouragement. - physical wellness classes to promote healthy lifestyles, movement, and stress reduction. - peer recovery groups offering accountability, encouragement, and tools for long-term sobriety and stability.- community partnerships strengthened collaborations with local organizations, food banks, correctional facilities, and health providers to extend resources and normalize conversations about mental health care.- grant support & community recognition ignite was awarded grants from the hamilton county council, the hamilton county council on alcohol and other drugs, and the Indiana family and social services administration (fssa). These investments reflect growing recognition of ignite as a trusted leader in mental health and community wellness across hamilton county and beyond.through these efforts, ignite transform not only provided direct services but also worked to normalize mental health care, reduce stigma, and create an environment where seeking help isencouraged and celebrated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 62
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $870.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $190K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.