Final Frontier Ministries
Legal name: Final Frontier Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431711771
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- +1 (615) 587-2807
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $822,503
- Expenses
- $475,716
- Assets
- $453,094
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- SANDRA ELKINS (Director): $54,592 total reported compensation
- AVNER BOSKEY (PRES & EXEC DIR): $24,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To stir up the creative arts, worship, intercession, evangelism and the prophetic gifts within a Jewish and Israeli matrix, and to foster intercession among believers for Israel's salvation and restoration.
What it reported doing in 2025
Fulfilling the mission of Final Frontier Ministries includes but is not limited to the fostering of intercessory prayer for the salvation of both the Jewish people and all other nations; the development of Bible based literature, and the development of evangelism and intercessory prayer music for the above efforts.THE MINISTRY PARTICIPATED IN AND CONDUCTED TEACHING, TRAINING AND INTERCESSORY PRAYER CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS IN THE US, CANADA, ENGLAND, GERMANY, MALAYSIA. THE MINISTRY YEARLY SENDS OUT PRAYER AND TEACHING NEWS AND INSTRUCTS IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS TO FULFILL ITS MISSION.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.2%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 70.9%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 41.2% of revenue deployed · 70.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $337K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 21 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.