Film Dayton Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263676429
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9375540031
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Film, Video
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,248
- Expenses
- $59,135
- Assets
- $24,598
- Liabilities
- $7,770
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAUNN BAKER (PRESIDENT)
- LISA GRIGSBY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- SHAUNN BAKER (PRESIDENT)
- LISA GRIGSBY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KARRI O'REILLY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to promote the increased production of film, television, video and other types of visual media in the dayton, oh area by marketing the dayton area as a filming location as well as by supporting local film makers in professional development, raising the profile of the dayton area, advancing educational opportunities and furthering the creative and economic redevelopment of the dayton area through programs such as the film screenings and the film dayton festival.
What it reported doing in 2016
Educational outreach - to bring leaders in the field to our local filmmakers to provide continuing education and professional development. Outreach focus to adolescent, high school, college and adult students to expand their interests and talents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.8%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 19.4%; rating input score 19
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -125.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 62%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -20.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -37.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.8% of revenue deployed · 19.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.