Filipino-American Club of the Jersey Shore (FILAMCLUB)
Legal name: Filipino-american Club of the Jersey Shore
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223718965
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Tinton Falls, New Jersey, US
- Phone
- +1 732.245.1975
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,463
- Expenses
- $646
- Assets
- $14,253
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mayo Ferrano (President)
- Flocie Zabat (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mayo Ferrano (President)
- Flocie Zabat (Vice President)
- Gilda Agacer (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Filipino-American Club of the Jersey Shore's mission is to formulate an organization that shall embody their ideals, promote a closer social relationship among members; elevate the moral and social attributes of themselves and of their posterity; to make possible for men and women of common interest to gather together in fellowship; to promote and celebrate Filipino culture and heritage, and to provide a forum for community members to come together and socialize.
What it reported doing in 2025
Club's 2025 Halloween Party; expense: $830; 62 people attended(included children); expense includes venue rental, DJ service, food expenses, DJ service, expense for decorations; door prizes for Best Costumes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 73.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.06; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -28.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 301.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.