FIL-Minnesotan Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411318173
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Saint Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6128125225
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,594
Expenses
$10,461
Assets
$85,312

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eric Lleva (President)
  • Jen Shier (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Eric Lleva (President)
  • Jen Shier (Vice President)
  • Aileen Luv (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Fil-Minnesotan Associations primary purpose is to promote awareness of the Filipino culture. Fil-Minnesotan Association is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing socio-civic, educational, cultural, and artistic opportunities to the community it is committed to serve.

What it reported doing in 2025

Feb 2025 Souvenir Program expense $7212.07Easter Fest expense $1165.11June 2025 FMSC expense $106.54CAPM Teacher Meet and Greet 2025 expense $600.66Pickleball 2025 Tournament expense $1499.85Golf 2025 Tournament expense $3086.422025 Consular Outreach expense $966.81Paskong Pilipino 2025 $2238.13

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.16; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $66K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.