Fieldstone Farm Therapeutic Riding Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341310435
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chagrin Falls, OH, USA
Phone
4407080013
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,231,803
Expenses
$2,557,332
Assets
$3,943,912
Liabilities
$119,190

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LYNNETTE R STUART (CEO)
  • THOMAS H ALLISON (PRESIDENT)
  • NADINE WALLMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LYNNETTE R STUART (CEO): $207,090 total reported compensation
  • MAUREEN FOSTER (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $151,995 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE MAPES (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $129,350 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fieldstone farm engages the therapeutic power of our horses to discover and nurture the special abilities of individuals, families, and communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

A horse can change a life! Horseback riding and interaction with horses results in many physical and mental benefits, including improved strength and balance and increased independence and self-esteem. The center provides equine programs to approximately 1,000 individuals of all ages with special needs annually. With the help of 250 volunteers annually (typically serving approximately 15,000 service hours per year) and 32 equine partners, the center is able to support "little victories and big impacts" every day! The center offers a diverse range of services. In addition to the largest program of therapeutic riding, the "gaitway high school" is an alternative school for students who thrive (continued on schedule o) best in a non-traditional academic environment. This experiential program is highly successful in teaching job and life skills due to the motivation of the horses and the natural environment. To date, 107 students have graduated. Additionally, more than 200 veterans of the united states armed forces participate in specialized programming that helps them cope with and overcome the physical and emotional challenges of military service. Other offerings include summer camp, carriage driving, a mobile miniature horse program, a reading program and equine mental health programming. Ridership sponsors make therapeutic riding financially possible for our participants. Donations subsidize 75% of the lesson cost for all. In addition, 92% of the schools and groups need additional financial support, as well as 77% of the overall student population. Essential academic, physical, and emotional benefits are derived from significant fundraising efforts for the ridership program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $207K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.