Field Neurosciences Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382790703
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Midland, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9898379039
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neurology, Neuroscience
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $679,067
- Expenses
- $213,724
- Assets
- $15,162,256
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEON JORDAN (INTERIM REGIONAL PRESIDENT (PART YEAR))
Highest reported compensation
- WATSON PINNEY MD LYDIA (DIRECTOR (PART YEAR)): $2,106,820 total reported compensation
- ADEL MD JOSEPH (DIRECTOR): $1,567,898 total reported compensation
- JEON JORDAN (INTERIM REGIONAL PRESIDENT (PART YEAR)): $801,312 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes of mymichigan medical center saginaw in relation to the prevention, early diagnosis, care, and cure of neurological diseases, disorders, and injuries.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided support for medical equipment, program support and the compassionate needs of patients served by mymichigan health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 61.1%; rating input score 61; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68.5%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 70.94; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 328.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $205K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 24 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.