Fhgr Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824508863
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Louisville, KY, USA
- Phone
- 5027418818
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $248,728
- Expenses
- $233,450
- Assets
- $201,704
- Liabilities
- $19,173
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DIANE CURTIS CLARK (EXECUTIVE DI): $38,182 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to provide free guidance and compassionate support during what may be the most difficult days of your life.
What it reported doing in 2024
2024 program service accomplishments summary in 2024, first hour grief response, inc. Significantly expanded its grief support services to individuals and families experiencing sudden loss. The organization trained 13 new grief mentors and group facilitators, increasing capacity for one-to-one and group-based services. We held 68 first-time individual grief mentoring sessions, addressing the acute needs of adults facing sudden loss. Youth services saw meaningful growth. Our hopewave in-school grief program partnered with four schools, delivering grief support in seven classroom settings and serving 49 students. Additionally, 18 youth (ages 8-18) attended monthly youth grief workshops, providing peer connection and creative outlets for healing. We provided targeted support to marginalized populations. The strides for healing suicide-loss program served 6 attendees through a therapeutic workshop. Exodus, a bi-monthly support group for the unhoused population, consistently reached an average of 5 participants per session, addressing grief in a high-risk community. Our specialized grief support groups were held at multiple locations, including marquette and secc blankenbaker, for people grieving the loss of a spouse, child, parent, or miscarriage. We also facilitated bible-based grief support studies for deeper spiritual processing. Our thrive workshops-monthly creative healing events for grieving adults- were held nine times, featuring activities such as painting, bracelet making, and mandala creation, with an average of 6-8 attendees each. The holiday grief workshop, held at studio nulu and featuring author sandy gross, hosted 18 grieving participants and 5 staff members, providing tools for coping with seasonal grief triggers. In november, we conducted two "how to help a griever" luncheons (totaling 20 attendees) to educate community members and professionals on grief sensitivity. Program services overview core programs included: "one-to-one grief mentoring "hopewave in-school youth program "monthly youth grief workshops "holiday grief workshop "emdr therapy scholarships "strides for healing suicide-loss support "thrive (adult connection workshops) "grief support groups (loss of spouse, parent, child, infant/miscarriage) "bible-based grief studies "exodus: support for the unhoused program service expenses and income program services expense: 87,294 program services income: 14,261 (includes 50% of salary for diane curtis clark due to direct service delivery in hopewave and client support; includes related marketing expenses.) client support & grief mentoring space expense: 66,844 client support income: 51,524 (space used for healing sessions, group facilitation, and workshops.)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $51.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $195K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.