Fhcsd Community Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461579623
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6195152300
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,656,229
- Expenses
- $354,175
- Assets
- $30,789,719
- Liabilities
- $20,234,736
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARBARA CARR (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- FRAN BUTLER-COHEN (TREASURER): $1,449,977 total reported compensation
- RICARDO ROMAN (SECRETARY): $590,416 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support the charitable and educational activities of family health centers of san diego, inc. (it's supported organization) and; facilitate the financing, development and construction of a new federally qualified health center located at 4725 market street, san diego ca 92102.
What it reported doing in 2024
Facilitate the financing, development and construction of a new federally qualified health center. It's supported organization (family health centers of san diego, inc.) will grant to fhcsd community services, inc., certain real property known as 4725 market street, san diego ca 92102. These facilities will provide quality health care services to the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 61
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.6%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 5
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 86.93; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.66; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.6% of revenue deployed · 4.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 3 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $17.5M reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.