Fh Community Living Program Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133213236
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2125820340
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$123,209
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENNETH J DUDEK (PRESIDENT, THRU SEP 2019)
  • Dr Ashwin Vasan (PRESIDENT, AS OF SEP 2019)

People named in this filing

  • ALEX A HERZAN (CHAIR)
  • CHARLES J MARSDEN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • GEORGE H BEANE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

F.h. Community living program, inc. Provides housing to people living with mental illness. On august 17, 2017, fh homes housing development fund corporation assumed administration of the program formerly owned by the reporting organization: a 20-unit apartment facility located at 2264-66 amsterdam avenue in manhattan, New York. The contract with the funding source for the reporting organization was transferred to the fh homes housing development fund corporation on such date. Attached is the board's approval to dissolve.

What it reported doing in 2019

On august 17, 2017, fh homes housing development fund corporation assumed administration of the program formerly owned by the reporting organization: a 20-unit apartment facility located at 2264-66 amsterdam avenue in manhattan, New York. The contract with the funding source for the reporting organization was transferred to the fh homes housing development fund corporation on such date. Attached is the board's approval to dissolve.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -78% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.