Fermi Forward Discovery Group, LLC
Legal name: Fermi Research Alliance Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 571239010
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Batavia, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6308408976
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,510,542
- Expenses
- $168,408,198
- Assets
- $730,662
- Liabilities
- $566,292
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
46 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN ANDERSON (PRESIDENT BEGAN 1/1/25, DIRECTOR THROUGH 12/31/24)
- NIKOLISTA LIA MERMINGA (PRESIDENT THROUGH 12/31/24)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL ALIVISATOS (CHAIRMAN): $2,082,741 total reported compensation
- NIKOLISTA LIA MERMINGA (PRESIDENT THROUGH 12/31/24): $819,087 total reported compensation
- JOHN MESTER (VICE CHAIR BEGAN 1/1/25): $632,486 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
FermiForward offers a fundamentally new approach to laboratory operations positioning Fermilab to achieve excellence in all areas of operations and business management.
What it reported doing in 2024
The u.s. Department of energy (doe) awarded the management and operating contract for fermi national accelerator laboratory (fermilab) to fra, llc, effective january 1, 2007-december 31,2025. Fra builds on universities research association's 50-year record of performance in the management and operation of fermilab; and the university of chicago's leadership of argonne national laboratory (anl) since its founding. The fra team brings resources, collaborations, and best practices to address the laboratory's challenges and opportunities. Fra supports the laboratory's long-term vision and total commitment to discovery, the doe scientific mission, and ensuring our nation's continued preeminence in particle physics. Presently, fermilab's primary ten-year goal is to establish a world-leading neutrino science program led by the long-baseline neutrino facility and deep underground neutrino experiment (lbnf/dune). Lbnf/dune advances the particle physics project prioritization panel (p5) plan by establishing the first phase of this facility with a new beamline and a far detector sited deep underground in South Dakota in the 2020s. As fermilab steps into this new role as host lab for lbnf/dune, the organizational structure is adjusting to support the scientists, students, technicians and engineers who are and will be working at the sanford underground research facility (surf) in South Dakota. The laboratory has established a new fermilab division, the South Dakota operations division, which is based full-time at surf to provide the same range of operational and support services that exist at fermilab's main campus in batavia, il. In addition, fermilab's major initiatives include leading one of the five doe national quantum information science (qis) research centers. The superconducting quantum materials and systems center (sqms) has the concrete and ambitious goal to develop, build, and deploy the first quantum computer at fermilab. The sqms center and other fermilab efforts are producing high-impact results in quantum computing, networking, and sensing and growing collaborations with universities, laboratories, and industry leaders in qis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.5%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.78; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 98.5% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $165.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 46 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $132.1M reported
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 30 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.