Fermi Forward Discovery Group Llc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933319101
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Batavia, IL, USA
Phone
2027789244
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Science and Technology N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$645,523,193
Expenses
$643,728,276
Assets
$22,247,753
Liabilities
$20,452,636

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NIKOLISTA LIA MERMINGA (PRESIDENT)
  • YOUNG-KEE KIM (INTERIM PRESIDENT BEGAN 1/13/2025)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAUL ALIVISATOS (CHAIRMAN): $2,082,741 total reported compensation
  • NIKOLISTA LIA MERMINGA (PRESIDENT): $819,087 total reported compensation
  • JOHN MESTER (VICE CHAIRMAN): $632,486 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary exempt purpose is the management and operation of the fermi national accelerator laboratory ("fermilab") in batavia, Illinois, an international scientific user facility owned by the u.s. Department of energy at which the fundamental nature of matter and energy is studied.

What it reported doing in 2024

The u.s. Department of energy (doe) awarded the management and operating contract for fermi national accelerator laboratory (fermilab) to ffdg, llc, effective january 1, 2025 . Ffdg builds on universities research association's record of performance in the management and operation of fermilab since 1967; and the university of chicago's leadership of argonne national laboratory (anl) since its founding. The ffdg team brings resources, collaborations, and best practices to address the laboratory's challenges and opportunities. Ffdg supports the laboratory's long-term vision and total commitment to discovery, the doe scientific mission, and ensuring our nation's continued preeminence in particle physics. Presently, fermilab's primary ten-year goal is to establish a world-leading neutrino science program led by the long-baseline neutrino facility and deep underground neutrino experiment (lbnf/dune). Lbnf/dune advances the particle physics project prioritization panel (p5) plan by establishing the first phase of this facility with a new beamline and a far detector sited deep underground in South Dakota in the 2020s. As fermilab steps into this new role as host lab for lbnf/dune, the organizational structure is adjusting to support the scientists, students, technicians and engineers who are and will be working at the sanford underground research facility (surf) in South Dakota. The laboratory has established a new fermilab division, the South Dakota operations division, which is based full-time at surf to provide the same range of operational and support services that exist at fermilab's main campus in batavia, il. In addition, fermilab's major initiatives include leading one of the five doe national quantum information science (qis) research centers. The superconducting quantum materials and systems center (sqms) has the concrete and ambitious goal to develop, build, and deploy the first quantum computer at fermilab. The sqms center and other fermilab efforts are producing high-impact results in quantum computing, networking, and sensing and growing collaborations with universities, laboratories, and industry leaders in qis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.8%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.92; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.8% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $637.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 28 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.