Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131940899
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Schaumburg, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8473035664
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,436,275
- Expenses
- $6,341,793
- Assets
- $7,755,048
- Liabilities
- $2,765,984
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Janice Yglesias (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Janice Yglesias (Executive Director): $398,082 total reported compensation
- Kathy Krafka Harkema (U.S. Technical Operations Director): $213,547 total reported compensation
- Angela Dickson (Marketing & Communications Director): $182,166 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fenestration Glazing and Industry Alliance is an organization comprised of window, door, and skylight industry manufacturers, suppliers, and independent industry affiliated members. The alliance provides a source of performance standards, product certification, and educational programs for the fenestration (windows, doors, etc.) industry.
What it reported doing in 2025
To write and enforce, through certification programs, performance specifications for fenestration industry assemblies, performance verifications for fenestration industry components, plus specifications and/or certification for framing and sash materials used in fenestration industry assemblies. Fgia certification program and its "gold label" are accepted as meeting most state and municipal building codes as the foremost fenestration industry certification program for providing assurance of product quality to builders, dealers, and building and home owners. In addition to the "gold label" certification, fgia also has a "silver label" certification to which manufacturers may certify thermal performance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 54
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $398K · 19 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $124K reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.