Feminar A Texas Nonprofit Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473345472
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Hallsville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9037360775
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,538
- Expenses
- $130,562
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBBIE MILLER (President)
People named in this filing
- Bob White (Executive Dir.)
- GEORGE PRITCHARD (Chairman)
- DEBBIE MILLER (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Feminar provides a life changing two day christian woman's conference to encourage and equip women to cultivate a deeper intimacy in thier walk with the lord, and to take tools home with them to live a christ driven life and be able to lead others to jesus. The event provides biblical teaching and passionate worship. It is our prayer that women who attend, will return home with hope and encouragement. We believe that hope and encouragement are best found in the word of god, through life changing worship, and through a personal relationship with jesus.
What it reported doing in 2019
Feminar provides a life changing two day christian woman's conference to encourage and equip women to cultivate a deeper intimacy in their walk with the lord, take tools home with them to live a christ driven life and be able to lead others to jesus. In 2019, over 1,000 tickets were sold to the event held.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 35
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -123%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 35.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.