Fellowship of Reconciliation Peace Presence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463722697
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $38,757
- Expenses
- $46,005
- Assets
- $9,666
- Liabilities
- $11,312
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- EMILY E SCHMITZ (Operations Consultant)
- Katherine Hinman (Board of Directors)
- John Lindsay Poland (Board of Directors)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote protect and educate for human rights through active nonviolence especially international accompaniment. To cooperate with organizations with similar purposes.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our singular program provides political and physical accompaniment to 5 communities and 3 organizations in Colombia. We collaborate with two full-time field accompaniers in Colombia who visit communities carry out workshops and provide physical accompaniment and advocacy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.17; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.