Feeding Westchester

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133507988
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Elmsford, NY, US
Phone
914.923.1100
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,174,501
Expenses
$41,903,877
Assets
$27,014,979
Liabilities
$9,329,223

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN ERREN (PRESIDENT / CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KAREN ERREN (PRESIDENT / CEO): $389,805 total reported compensation
  • JENINE KELLY-MORLEDGE (VP, DEVELOPMENT): $314,771 total reported compensation
  • TAMI WILSON-RIVERA (COO): $307,377 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to nourish our neighbors in the fight against hunger.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fy 25, feeding westchester provided over 21 million pounds of food, 39% of which was fresh fruits and vegetables, throughout westchester county alongside our partners and through our direct distributions.emergency food providers (efp) - in collaboration with more than 175 community partners and programs, in fy25 we distributed over 17.7 million pounds of food equivalent to more than 14.75 million meals to children, families, seniors, and veterans throughout westchester county.mobile markets, formerly mobile food pantry, makes more than 650 scheduled stops a year. In fy 25, it brought more thant 3.25 million pounds of fresh fruits, vegetables, meats, and dairy to those in need.fresh market is an extension of our mobile food pantry. In fy 25, we provided communities with over 615,000 pounds of nutritious food and fresh produce in areas in which it is difficult to access affordable or high-quality fresh food.child-feeding programs provide children in our community with 758,000 pounds of nutritious, kid-friendly, and easy-to-prepare food kids need on the weekends and during school closures through our partner hubs. Retail recovery recovers food from more than 80 retailers. We captured more than 5.1 million pounds of good, nutritious food that would otherwise go to waste. At our distribution center, we inspect, sort, and pack the food, then we get it straight to the people who need it most. Green thumb distributed over 1.16 million pounds of fresh produce which focuses on increasing access to fresh produce for all; with our partnering agencies, we distribute fresh, seasonal, top-quality produce, as well as valuable information.senior grocery encourages better health and independent living for seniors; we distribute nutritious food like seasonal fruits and vegetables directly to seniors in need. In fy 25, we distributed 615,000 pounds of nutritious food such as seasonable fruits and vegetables directly to locations where seniors congregate and live.nutrition education offers free access to resources inclduing general information on healthy eating and wellness, interactive workshops, cooking demonstations, and food safety training.snap outreach helps people enroll in apply for supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) which is a federal initiative that helps thousands of low-income westchester residents put food on their tables.food as medicine (formerly rx pantry) targets clinical care and other community resources through a combination of improved food access. The food is medicine program eliminates critical barriers to improved health and well-being, providing fresh produce, groceries, nutrition education, and wraparound health services to our neighbors in need. This is a collaborative project involving healthcare facilities such as hospitals, clinics, and federally qualified health centers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 41%; rating input score 41; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $390K · 34 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.4M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.