Feed the Hungry San Miguel Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201193434
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Laredo, TX, USA
Phone
9704760814
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$600,531
Expenses
$1,037,562
Assets
$3,102,401
Liabilities
$4,719

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOAN NAGELKIRK (TREASURER): $5,000 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER VENKATRAMEN (SECRETARY): $2,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fthsm is a non-governmental organization that raises funds for feed the hungry, a.c. A mexican not-for-profit corporation which provides free meals for the poor of san miguel de allende, gto, mexico.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, provided 1,180,861 meals using 50 kitchens & locations, served 4,981 beneficiaries, provided 283 nutrition education workshops, and provided 130,220 liters of water. Meals program: through our schol kitchen in poor communities, we provide more than 5,000 hot, well-balanced meals every schoool day to disadvantaged children. We also deliver foodstuffs for the daily meals of hundreds of orphans, childrens with disabilities, and elderly who are served by seven local urban charities. Early childhood program: the program is designed to diagnose and monitor the childrens conditions as well as educate the mothers about proper nutrition. This program provides sustenance for children who have been weaned but are not yet in school; typically, eight months old to four or five years old. In communities where the early childhood nutrition program is operational, mothers who have enrolled in the program receive twice- monthly deliveries of food and educational workshops. This program is currently operating in 18 communities.early childhood program: the program is designed to diagnose and monitor the childrens conditions as well as educate the mothers about proper nutrition. This program provides sustenance for children who have been weaned but are not yet in school; typically, eight months old to four or five years old. In communities where the early childhood nutrition program is operational, mothers who have enrolled in the program receive twice-monthly deliveries of food and educational workshops. This program is currently operating in 18 communities. Extended alimentation: even in some of the communities where we provide school meals, additional nutritional support for the rest of the family is sorely needed. In response, we developed the extended alimentation program to help provide food and education for specific families who present cases of severe malnutrition. The program launched in february 2022. Using our health score system and data from health assessments, we identify communities where we operate school kitchens, yet there are a high number of moderate to severely underweight school children. Socioeconomic studies of their families were conducted, and the families that agreed to participate are now receiving twice-monthly supplies of fresh food as well as high protein dry goods. They also benefit from workshops and counseling provided by our nutritionists. The program is currently active in 16 communities. Hydration program: during 2025, we supplied purified water to 28 kitchens for food preparation and drinking water.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 73
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -72.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.99; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $975K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.