Feed Analysis Consortium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204495504
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Champaign, IL, USA
Phone
2173563182
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal Husbandry

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,049
Expenses
$80,733
Assets
$29,124

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve the feed industry by building and maintaining a comprehensive and evolving database of feed analysis information, developing improved and more rapid methods of feed analysis, and encouraging the development of improved diet formulation and evaluation models.

What it reported doing in 2010

To establish reference methods for the analysis of all chemical components, obtain accurate and validated chemical, physical, and relevant digestibility data for all feedstuffs, identify changes in feedstuff composition as a result of genetics, processing methods, and the environment, quantify relationships between the chemical composition of feeds and biologically derived estimates of ruminal digestion rates and intestinal digestibility coefficients, evaulate and validate rapid methods of feed analysis, and support the development and continued advancement of diet formulation and evaluation models.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -83.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.